Posts By: admin

IN THE WHERE COUNTY COURT CLAIM NO : 1AA99999 BETWEEN:   RTA (Business Sales) Limited (Claimant) And   Mr Defendant (Defendants)   BAILII Citation Number: [1956] EWCA Civ 3 Case No.: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL Royal Courts of Justice, 26th March 1956 B e f o r e : LORD… Read Article →

IN THE WHERE COUNTY COURT CLAIM NO : 1AA99999 BETWEEN:   RTA (Business Sales) Limited (Claimant) And   Mr Defendant (Defendants)       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE MAYOR’S AND CITY OF LONDON COURT (HIS HONOUR JUDGE McDONNELL) Royal Courts of Justice Courts of… Read Article →

IN THE WHERE COUNTY COURT CLAIM NO : 1AA99999 BETWEEN:   RTA (Business Sales) Limited (Claimant) And   Mr Defendant (Defendants)     Neutral Citation Number: [2008] EWCA Civ 419 Case No 6KT01606 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM KINGSTON UPON THAMES COUNTY COURT (HER HONOUR JUDGE… Read Article →

IN THE WHERE COUNTY COURT CLAIM NO : 1AA99999 BETWEEN:   RTA (Business Sales) Limited (Claimant) And   Mr Defendant (Defendants)         BAILII Citation Number: [1914] UKHL 1     HOUSE OF LORDS         Date: 01 July 1914 Between:    DUNLOP PNEUMATIC TYRE  COMPANY, LIMITED APPELLANTS   – v –… Read Article →

RTA-vs-Draper – click here for a downloadable version   IN THE PETERBOROUGH COUNTY COURT Claim No: 8SF07494 Crown Building Rivergate Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE1 1EJ 28th October 2009 BEFORE: HIS HONOUR JUDGE DE MILLE RTA (SALES) LIMITED CLAIMANT -v- G DRAPER DEFENDANT The Claimant appeared in person MR WILLIAMS appeared on behalf of the Defendant Transcript… Read Article →

As always, the information provided is the result of the experiences of defendants who have been in dispute. It is NOT intended to replace professional legal advice and you should always see a solicitor about any claim against you. Remember to take the skeleton argument (in the Court Bundle section) with you. If you get… Read Article →

As always, the information provided is the result of the experiences of defendants who have been in dispute. It is NOT intended to replace professional legal advice and you should always see a solicitor about any claim against you. Remember to take the skeleton argument (in the Court Bundle section) with you. If you receive… Read Article →

As always, the information provided is the result of the experiences of defendants who have been in dispute. It is NOT intended to replace professional legal advice and you should always see a solicitor about any claim against you. Remember to take the skeleton argument (in the Court Bundle section) with you. You should receive… Read Article →

As always, the information provided is the result of the experiences of defendants who have been in dispute. It is NOT intended to replace professional legal advice and you should always see a solicitor about any claim against you. Remember to take the skeleton argument (in the Court Bundle section) with you. When you need… Read Article →

A few notes about Part 18 requests. Part 18 requests cannot be used on the small claims track. Cases are allocated to a track AFTER the allocation questionnaires are sent back So a Part 18 request can only be done in the time from receiving the summons to sending back the Allocation Questionnaire A part… Read Article →